language and color perception

"Does language shape what we perceive, a position associated with the late Benjamin Lee Whorf, or are our perceptions pure sensory impressions, immune to the arbitrary ways that language carves up the world?

The latest research changes the framework, perhaps the language of the debate, suggesting that language clearly affects some thinking as a special device added to an ancient mental skill set. Just as adding features to a cellphone or camera can backfire, language is not always helpful. For the most part, it enhances thinking. But it can trip us up, too.

The traditional subject of the tug of war over language and perception is color. Because languages divide the spectrum differently, researchers have asked whether language affected how people see color. English, for example, distinguishes blue from green. Most other languages do not make that distinction. Is it possible that only English speakers really see those colors as different?

Past investigations have had mixed results. Some experiments suggested that color terms influenced people in the moment of perception. Others suggested that the language effect kicked in only after some basic perception occurred.

The consensus was that different ways to label color probably did not affect the perception of color in any systematic way.

Last year, Lera Boroditsky and colleagues published a study in The Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences showing that language could significantly affect how quickly perceptions of color are categorized. Russian and English speakers were asked look at three blocks of color and say which two were the same.

Russian speakers must distinguish between lighter blues, or goluboy, and darker blues, siniy, while English speakers do not have to, using only “blue” for any shade. If the Russians were shown three blue squares with two goluboy and one siniy, or the other way around, they picked the two matching colors faster than if all three squares were shades from one blue group. English makes no fundamental distinction between shades of blue, and English speakers fared the same no matter the mix of shades.

In two different tests, subjects were asked to perform a nonverbal task at the same time as the color-matching task. When the Russians simultaneously carried out a nonverbal task, they kept their color-matching advantage. But when they had to perform a verbal task at the same time as color-matching, their advantage began to disappear. The slowdown suggested that the speed of their reactions did not result just from a learned difference but that language was actively involved in identifying colors as the test was happening. Two other recent studies also demonstrated an effect of language on color perception and provided a clue as to why previous experimental results have been inconclusive. In The Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Dr. Paul Kay of the International Computer Science Institute at Berkeley and colleagues hypothesized that if language is dominant on the left side of the brain, it should affect color perception in the right visual field. (The right visual field is connected to the left side of the brain, and vice versa.)

English-speaking subjects were shown a ring of 12 small squares that were all the same color except an odd one on the left or the right. If the odd square was shown to the right visual field and it was from a completely different color category in English, like a green square compared to the ring of blue squares, then subjects were quick to identify it as different. If the odd square shown to the right visual field was the same basic color as the ring of squares, perhaps just being a different shade of blue, subjects were not as fast to recognize the difference. If the odd square was shown to the left visual field, it didn’t matter if it was a different color or only a different shade.

The extent to which language affected color perception depended on the side of the brain being used."

"Language helps us learn novel categories, and it licenses our unusual ability to operate on an abstract plane, Dr. Lupyan said. The problem is that after a category has been learned, it can distort the memory of specific objects, getting between us and the rest of the nonabstract world."

When Language Can Hold the Answer, Christine Kenneally. April 22, 2008
http://www.nytimes.com/2008/04/22/science/22lang.html?pagewanted=1&_r=1

Seeing Sounds and Tasting Colors

"The word synaesthesia (also spelled synæsthesia and synesthesia) is derived from the Greek syn, meaning "together" or "union", and aesthesis or aisthesis, meaning "sensation" or "to perceive". Thus, depending on who you are talking to, synaesthesia can be taken to mean "synthetic experience" or "joined sensation" or "to perceive together". And if you think this is confusing, just wait to see what's to come...

In a nutshell, synaesthesia embraces a variety of different conditions in which the stimulation of one sets of sensory inputs (say sound) is simultaneously perceived by one or more of the other senses (sight or touch, for example).

There are many different forms of synaesthesia. For our purposes here, we are primarily interested in those that pertain to color vision. One very common type is when folks associate numbers and letters of the alphabet with different colors. For example, consider the way in which a non-synaesthete would see the alphabet printed as black text on white paper as illustrated below:

Now consider the same alphabet – still presented as black text – as it might be seen by a synaesthete as illustrated below:

Note that the above is simply a representation created by the author of this paper. Every synaesthete (of this type) perceives their own color alphabet. Having said this, research on a large number of synaesthetes reveals certain trends, such as the fact that 'a' is often red, 'b; is often blue, 'c' is often yellow, and so forth.

Another interesting point is that some synaesthetes "see" the letters as being black, but "perceive" the colors as being "associated" with the letters. By comparison, other synaesthetes actually do "see/perceive" the letters as having those colors.""

"It's important to note that synaesthesia is additive; that is, it "overlays" the primary senses. Also, we should remind ourselves that there are many different types of synaesthesia. For example, when some synaesthetes hear music, they might see patterns of colors hovering about three feet in front of them. A trill of the flute may appear as a collection of purple triangles and small pink dots, for example. (It is said that if a non-synaesthete wants to get a feel for what this might be like to experience, a good start would be to watch appropriate portions of the original Fantasia movie by Walt Disney.)

So how many of us are synaesthetes? This is really difficult to pin down, because there are so many different types (listening to music can cause a tickling sensation of touch, or a perception of different smells, or ...), and different folks can be affected to lesser or greater amounts (a "feel" of a color versus actually "seeing" that color). Some estimates put synaesthetes as being roughly one in 25,000, while others say one in 2,000, and still others say as many as one in 100 may by synaesthetic."

http://www.diycalculator.com/sp-cvision.shtml#A8b

I find it interesting that some people have a natural sense for coding colors.